MetaQuotesvsTradeLocker
A side-by-side look at how MetaQuotes and TradeLocker compare for brokers across integrations, pricing, launch time, deployment and support. When you're ready, request quotes from both — free and with no obligation.
Last reviewed by the BrokerBazaar B2B research team
Brokers that want the industry-standard MT4/MT5 terminals.
CFD and prop firms wanting a modern web-first platform.
- Vendor support
- Global partner network
- Vendor support
- Fast onboarding
Frequently asked questions
Is MetaQuotes or TradeLocker better for brokers?
Both are established trading platforms providers. MetaQuotes is best suited to brokers that want the industry-standard MT4/MT5 terminals. TradeLocker is best suited to CFD and prop firms wanting a modern web-first platform. The right choice depends on your stage, budget and integration needs — request pricing from both to compare on a like-for-like basis.
How do MetaQuotes and TradeLocker pricing compare?
Commercials for both depend on your setup, volumes and configuration, so published figures are indicative only. Request a quote from each through BrokerBazaar — free and with no obligation — to compare real numbers.
How quickly can a broker go live with MetaQuotes vs TradeLocker?
MetaQuotes quotes a typical launch of 4-8 weeks. TradeLocker quotes a typical launch of 2-4 weeks. Real timelines depend on licensing, integrations and how ready your own team is.
Do MetaQuotes and TradeLocker integrate with the same platforms?
Their published integration lists differ, so confirm with each provider that they connect to the platform, CRM and payment tools already in your stack before committing.